BLOG

Research: Gather Your Facts for Better Decision Making

By Kamyar Shah  •  July 15, 2020  •  8 min read

Kamyar Shah, Fractional COO & Management Consultant - Research: Gather Your Facts for Better Decision Making

Research is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing factual information to inform better decisions. Gathering facts reduces guesswork and reveals patterns that shape outcomes. Organizations that prioritize research make choices backed by evidence rather than assumptions, leading to stronger results and fewer costly mistakes.

Kamyar Shah · Fractional COO Insight
Research: Gather Your Facts for Better Decision Making
Research ≠ Analysis, But They Must Work Together
Research and analytical decision-making are closely tied but distinct. Rather than treating them as separate activities, the article recommends using both to complement each other, research findings feed directly into analytical frameworks.
Leaders Over-Rely on Personal Experience
Research is undervalued because leaders default to their own knowledge and the experiences of others, which proves surprisingly limited compared to the breadth of information available on nearly any subject.
9 Research Methods Every Leader Should Know
The article identifies Basic, Qualitative, Quantitative, Observational, Longitudinal, Cross-sectional, Correlational, Causal-comparative, and Experimental methodologies, each suited to different business problems and models.
Research Design Before Research Method
Effective research starts with design, how you plan to answer the question, before selecting the method. Skipping this step leads to efficiency without effectiveness, a costly mistake in decision-making.
Source: kamyarshah.com · World Consulting Group

Research is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing factual information to inform better decisions. Gathering facts reduces guesswork and reveals patterns that shape outcomes. Organizations that prioritize research make choices backed by evidence rather than assumptions, leading to stronger results and fewer costly mistakes. The following sections detail proven research strategies.

Research is often undervalued in a company as leaders rely on their own experiences, their knowledge set, and the knowledge and experiences of others. Surprisingly this can prove to be a limited amount of knowledge and insights when compared to the breadth of information that exists on nearly any subject matter.

Free 20-Minute Operations Review

Dealing with a specific operational bottleneck? Kamyar Shah works with founders and CEOs to identify the root cause and build a fix.

Book a 20-Minute Operations Review →

The goal of this article is to discuss Research: Gather Your Facts for Better Decision Making. A company’s success depends heavily on the quality of its decisions. Efficiency in decision making matters, but researching the facts and options available to you matters just as much.

Research versus Analytical Decision-Making

Research is very closely tied to analytical decision-making. Both are based on gathering as much information as possible. Research findings oftentimes play into analytical decision-making. Rather than consider them as two whole separate activities it is suggested that both be used to complement each other.

Getting Good at Research

Getting good at research requires several activities that when executed upon will result in more decisions being supported by research findings (and where necessary, analysis to understand the research).

The dictionary.com definition defines research as the diligent and systematic inquiry or investigation into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, applications, etc.

When conducting research, you will need to consider your research design, which is how you plan to answer the question in front of you. You will also need to choose the research methods that execute that plan.

Depending upon your company’s business model you may engage in the usage of different types of research methods for solving or understanding different types of problems. The research methodologies are quite varied, so a general understanding of the main types helps. The descriptions below are the author’s interpretation of commonly used definitions:

  • Basic: This is characterized when you just jump right in to research without any preconceived conclusions and are just seeking to improve your understanding of a situation.
  • Qualitative: This type of research is typified by textual data. That might be responses to survey questions, feedback given in a focus group, or dialogue from an interview.
  • Quantitative: Your research may involve data that is numerical, or data that can be categorized and assigned numerical values for analytical analysis. Then you can conduct quantitative research.
  • Observational: This is when you observe behaviors exhibited by participants in a situation to understand the unguided reactions and responses to the environment around them.
  • Longitudinal: This is a term used when the research observations are measured over time. An example could be an adult’s approach to parenting subjects over time (from before they had children, during stages of when they had children, and after their children have left). To understand what changes over time.
  • Cross-sectional: This is when you are working to the data you are studying represent the population or a subset that allows you to get a cross-sectional approach.
  • Correlational: This is a non-experimental research method, in which a researcher measures two variables, understand and assess the statistical relationship between them with no influence from any extraneous variable
  • Causal-comparative: This is when you are trying to research the relationship between independent and dependent variables differences that already exist between groups.
  • Experimental: You are using an experimental methodology whenever you follow scientific research design. You start with a hypothesis and use variables that you measure, calculate, and compare to prove or disprove it.
  • Exploratory: In the early stages of looking at a problem, an exploratory approach starts without any preconceived hypothesis. Its initial investigation builds a general understanding that may lead to further research using other methods.
  • Descriptive: This is when you are describing the “what” of your research
  • Explanatory: This is when your research outlines what the research is intended to study and resolve and the methods to be to resolve the problem

Preparing to Conduct Your Research

Numerous steps should be taken as you build the research muscle of your organization

To work to the quality of research is beneficial to your organization you will want to consider who should conduct the research. Whomever you choose to conduct your research should have experience in setting up the type of research you are looking to have completed.

  • Senior Leadership Commitment: As noted before leaders often rely on their own knowledge or that of a small group of individuals. Getting your senior leadership to expect that deep research to be used when solving problems is a critical factor improving your research capabilities
  • Hiring Research Capable Employees: It is also important to look for characteristics in new hires that would suggest they are good researchers or are interested in becoming good. Look for candidates who like to research solutions online. Pose critical thinking questions, measure how they respond, gauge their analysis capabilities, and have them explain how they solve problems.
  • Training: Every manager/leader is not educated in or interested in research. However, a common research language across managers and leaders can strengthen the organization’s collective approach to research and its understanding of research findings. Partnering with your human resources department and training department will result in the development of baseline expectations as it relates to researching.
  • Incorporate into Analytical Decisions: As stated earlier research and analytical decision making are closely related. It is important that any analytical decision-making consider any research methodologies that should be incorporated to improve the quality of the analysis.
  • Project Prioritization: Research is also important as it relates to project prioritization. A project that is lacking adequate and fundamental research that supports the project assumptions and goals should be suspect.
  • In-house Expert: Not all companies can support having Ph.D. level scientists on their payroll. However, it helps to have a go-to subject matter expert who understands the scientific implications of various modeling techniques in depth. That person can guide internal leaders on research matters. In the absence of an in-house expert, you should consider hiring outside experts to consult on your larger projects.

Your Research Process

Each research effort may vary somewhat in the approach based on the methodology used, however, most will contain most of the following steps:

  • Problem/Opportunity Identification (POI): This often comes in the form of identifying something that has occurred, wanting to understand how to capitalize on an opportunity.
  • Resource Review: This can be as broad and varied as the types of POIs you develop. As you conduct a resource review consider everything from internet resources, academic journals, subject matter experts, etc.
  • Update Your POI: After doing some research you may want to clarify the problem you are trying to research or the opportunity you are looking into.
  • Common Terminology: Outline and define all of your research content in understandable terms.
  • Who/What/Where: Define clearly the parameters of your research subject(s)
  • Methodology: Clearly define how you will be conducting your research to ensure the information your research and gather is as unbiased as possible.
  • Data Collection: Gather as much information on your research subject(s) as possible to aid in the analysis of your data.
  • Analysis: Conduct the types of analysis that are necessary to aid the research results. As spoken to early research is very closely tied to analytical decision-making.
  • Interpretation: As part of your research you may be interpreting the results for a summary to your audience.
  • Conclusion/Recommendation: This may or may not be a step in each research project. It is recommended that the researcher provide any conclusions or recommendations they have from their involvement. With the research as it relates to the Problem/Opportunity Identification (POI) identified at the beginning of the research process.

Building an expectation of research-based decision-making will take time and effort. Once incorporated into your culture you can expect that initiatives will be well thought out with various options considered and positioned for optimal success.

author avatar
Kamyar Shah Fractional COO, Fractional CMO & Business Consultant
Fractional COO, Fractional CMO, and Executive Coach, Kamyar Shah, founder of World Consulting Group with over 25 years of experience helping organizations achieve operational excellence and sustainable growth. He has led 650+ consulting engagements across a dozen-plus industries, and he now leads AI implementation for founder-led companies. Kamyar contributes regularly to KamyarShah.com and Coruzant.

Is Operational Drag Slowing Your Growth?

Book a 20-minute review with Kamyar Shah. Identify the bottleneck costing you the most. Walk away with a specific next step.

Book a 20-Minute Operations Review →

Frequently Asked Questions

What role does research play in decision making?

Research is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing factual information to inform better decisions. Gathering facts reduces guesswork and reveals patterns that shape outcomes. Organizations that prioritize research make choices backed by evidence rather than assumptions, which compounds over time as each well-grounded decision avoids the rework that guesses generate.

How does research differ from analytical decision-making?

Research and analytical decision-making are closely tied but distinct. Research gathers and organizes factual information, while analysis applies systematic reasoning to that information to reach a choice. Treating them as separate activities creates gaps. The article argues they must work together, with research feeding analysis rather than operating as an isolated exercise.

How does an organization get good at research?

Skill develops through repetition with structure, defining the question precisely, identifying credible sources, and collecting facts systematically rather than grabbing whatever confirms existing beliefs. Good researchers separate observation from interpretation. Organizations improve by making research a standard preparation step before significant decisions instead of an occasional response to uncertainty.

How should one prepare to conduct research?

Preparation starts with defining what decision the research will inform, since that boundary determines which facts matter. Then identify where reliable information lives and how much depth the decision justifies. A clear preparation phase prevents the most common failure, collecting volumes of interesting information that never connects to the choice at hand.

What does a sound research process look like?

A sound process moves through defined stages. Frame the question, gather facts from credible sources, organize findings into patterns, and hand structured evidence to the decision process. Discipline at each stage matters more than sophistication. The output should make the eventual decision easier to defend and cheaper to revisit when conditions change.

How is research discipline applied in Kamyar Shah's consulting work?

Business consulting engagements begin with structured fact-gathering, since recommendations are only as good as the evidence beneath them. Kamyar Shah applies the research-then-analysis sequence to operational questions, replacing assumption-driven choices with evidence-backed ones. Companies keep the process after the engagement ends, which improves decision quality permanently rather than for one project.

Kamyar Shah

Kamyar Shah

Fractional COO & AI Implementation Consultant | 25+ Years Experience

Fractional COO, Fractional CMO, and Executive Coach, Kamyar Shah, founder of World Consulting Group with over 25 years of experience helping organizations achieve operational excellence and sustainable growth. He has led 650+ consulting engagements across a dozen-plus industries, and he now leads AI implementation for founder-led companies. Kamyar contributes regularly to KamyarShah.com and Coruzant.

Related Articles

BLOG

People Problems

by Kamyar Shah  |  Jun 3, 2016

People problems are interpersonal conflicts arising from miscommunication, unmet expectations, and competing goals in personal or professional relationships.…

Read More →
BLOG

Customer Service Revisited

by Kamyar Shah  |  Mar 18, 2016

Quick Answer: Service breakdowns stem from system design, not employee capability. When customer contacts spike and quality drops,…

Read More →

Ready to Fix What Is Slowing You Down?

Kamyar Shah works directly with founders and CEOs between $2M and $100M to build the operations layer their growth requires.

Book a 20-Minute Operations Review →

Bringing Consulting to You: Where Strategy Meets Execution Kamyar Shah